<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for UberEmployable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uberemployable.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uberemployable.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:13:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Did You Know? Unemployment Benefits In Your Choice Of State by SEW</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/07/did-you-know-unemployment-benefits-in-your-choice-of-state/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>SEW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 03:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=134#comment-36</guid>
		<description>That is correct.  I worked part of the year in SC and part of the year in WI and I claimed both (taking WI&#039;s higher level), getting Wisconsin&#039;s $363 rather than SC&#039;s $326 per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is correct.  I worked part of the year in SC and part of the year in WI and I claimed both (taking WI&#8217;s higher level), getting Wisconsin&#8217;s $363 rather than SC&#8217;s $326 per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on UE144: QA Director In Phoenix, AZ by Twitted by uberemployable</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/08/ue144-qa-director-in-phoenix-az/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by uberemployable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=187#comment-23</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by uberemployable [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by uberemployable [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nominee: Best First Impression Of The Year by Angelica</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/08/nominee-best-first-impression-of-the-year/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Angelica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=172#comment-22</guid>
		<description>I was going to say that I went through a whole interview once with a piece of basil stuck on my teeth, but i think this beats mine any day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to say that I went through a whole interview once with a piece of basil stuck on my teeth, but i think this beats mine any day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nominee: Best First Impression Of The Year by Twitted by Nichole_Runnels</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/08/nominee-best-first-impression-of-the-year/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitted by Nichole_Runnels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 13:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=172#comment-21</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was Twitted by Nichole_Runnels [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was Twitted by Nichole_Runnels [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overqualified Candidates: Should You Dumb Yourselves Down? by uberemployable</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/07/overqualified-candidates-should-you-dumb-yourselves-down/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>uberemployable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=101#comment-7</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d argue with you, but... you have a job and I don&#039;t, so you must know what you&#039;re talking about ;)

Good insight Jessica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d argue with you, but&#8230; you have a job and I don&#8217;t, so you must know what you&#8217;re talking about ;)</p>
<p>Good insight Jessica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Overqualified Candidates: Should You Dumb Yourselves Down? by Jessica</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/07/overqualified-candidates-should-you-dumb-yourselves-down/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 21:51:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=101#comment-6</guid>
		<description>Mitch - these are all useful tips and this website is a great idea. And good luck to everybody out there still searching.

i disagree with the statement that employers are not looking for overqualified people, especially in this market. generally if employers can get 9 years of experience and only pay for 6 years, thats a pretty good deal. its a buyer&#039;s market for employers - there are tons of people that are desperate for a job and willing to take a pay cut. If you really want that job you have to make it clear to the employer that you are ready, willing AND happy to roll up your sleeves and do the dirty work, despite the extent of your previous experience. If you are overqualified by 10 years, its probably unlikely that they will hire you, but by maybe 3-5 years? I think you still have a shot in this market without &quot;dumbing down&quot;. i&#039;ve seen it happen multiple times recently - although i work in finance, so maybe its different in other industries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mitch &#8211; these are all useful tips and this website is a great idea. And good luck to everybody out there still searching.</p>
<p>i disagree with the statement that employers are not looking for overqualified people, especially in this market. generally if employers can get 9 years of experience and only pay for 6 years, thats a pretty good deal. its a buyer&#8217;s market for employers &#8211; there are tons of people that are desperate for a job and willing to take a pay cut. If you really want that job you have to make it clear to the employer that you are ready, willing AND happy to roll up your sleeves and do the dirty work, despite the extent of your previous experience. If you are overqualified by 10 years, its probably unlikely that they will hire you, but by maybe 3-5 years? I think you still have a shot in this market without &#8220;dumbing down&#8221;. i&#8217;ve seen it happen multiple times recently &#8211; although i work in finance, so maybe its different in other industries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Employers, Wake Up: It&#8217;s a Buyer&#8217;s Market by ragamunchkin</title>
		<link>http://www.uberemployable.com/2009/07/employers-wake-up-its-a-buyers-market/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>ragamunchkin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 16:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uberemployable.com/?p=64#comment-5</guid>
		<description>hear hear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hear hear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
